Tuesday, August 10, 2010

The Real Story Of The Great Salary Cull of 2010

First off, I've got to pimp by buddy's blog, which is best described as Chicago-focused general sports talk. Very insightful, covers a range of topics, and far less lengthy than what you'll find around here. Check it out here.


I don't think I've ever heard anything stupider, more mis-applied, or more ignorant than the concept that the Hawks have just finished up a firesale that mirrored the infamous version the Florida Marlins of 1997 executed.

Those Marlins mortgaged their entire future to accumulate as many big money stars as possible, rode them to a title, and then chose to immediately sell every single piece they could to avoid having to foot the salary bill for another season, guaranteeing a long rebuilding process that would keep the team out of contention for years.

The 2010 Chicago Blackhawks patiently developed an unheard collection of talent, wisely (for the most part) spent to add pieces to the tremendous young core as it came into its own, rode them to a title, strategically decided which players were key core components moving forward, were forced only by the league's salary cap rules to shed the complimentary pieces, and in doing so secured the talent that should help keep the team in title contention for the foreseeable future.


The fact that anyone would confuse those two storylines above is evidence of severe retardation. The Great Salary Cull of 2010 was a work of absolute genius coming and going. Period, end of story. As a Hawks fan, you should feel great about what got us here and you should feel great about where we're going from here. This was genius at work - we've already enjoyed some of the fruits and we'll most definitely enjoy more in the future.

Despite the difficulties of watching many of our Cup heroes leave this summer, it was most definitely genius that caused it to happen. Dale Tallon, the Bowmans, and a number of other great front office hockey minds assembled such an absurd array of talent that to keep it together this season would have meant a cap number of over $72M!

Yep, just adding up the 2010-2011 salaries of all of the guys who saw action in the playoffs, you get a cap number that is more than $12M over the cap. And that's assuming Boynton signs for the league minimum of $500k this year, ignores Kimmy Johnsson, who made $4.8M last year and probably is in line for at least $2-3M this year, and doesn't factor in the $4.1M of cap bonuses the Hawks are on the hook for this season.

The Hawks front office deserves endless accolades for getting a team with a market value of $70-$80M to fit into a cap that stood at $56M last year. Especially because only two of the players on the team were significantly overpaid. Campbell shouldn't be making more than $5M (instead of his $7.142M cap hit) and Huet, even at the time of his signing, shouldn't have gotten more than $3M (instead of his $5.625M cap hit). Throw in Sopel being a bit overpaid at $2.333M (instead of maybe 1.2ish?) and we're still only talking $5M or so in bad cap use. With the bonuses, that's still a team that's legitimately worth $70M, easy.

Oh, and there's that little thing about winning the first Stanley Cup in almost half a century to consider. Yep, all told, I'd say that Tallon, the Bowmans, and their colleagues did a freakin wonderful job collecting so much talent that they were laughably over the NHL Salary Cap limit when all was said and done. You should view this forced exodus, while clearly a bummer, as a big giant star on the homework assignments of the Hawks' front office.


So these guys were geniuses for putting us in this position - but did they really make all the right moves in responding to it? Well, only time will really tell. Maybe they let go of a superstar or kept a bust. Maybe these prospects they traded for won't ever develop. Maybe the guys who they created roster space for don't step up. Maybe the players they select with all their draft picks amount to nothing.

But from where we're sitting right now, I think the Bowmans have done a great job this summer. First off, as I'll detail in a post to come, they made the exact right choices as to who to keep around as the core. I loved a lot of the guys who left town this summer, but I wouldn't have chosen to keep any of them over the ones the Hawks did.

Toews, Sharp, Bolland, Kane, Hossa, Keith, Seabrook, Campbell and the Hammer form a group of players that could contend for the Cup for the next decade. This is a group that will dominate in all three zones, on all three units, in every aspect of the game. They are young, committed, and hungry. They are experienced, proven, and reliable. As long as you can look out onto the ice and see a collection of players like that, as a fan you've got to feel amazing about your hockey club.

I want to stress that again - with the above players skating for the Hawks next year, we should be just fine. You hear a lot of snide comments about the Hawks not having anyone left next year - retarded. I'm not sure there are more than 2-3 teams that wouldn't trade their entire roster for the Hawks' core. This club, while certainly facing some growing pains, will be a Cup favorite and a real power, if, like every one else, they can stay healthy.

Second, it sounds like the Hawks really loaded up on all levels of prospects - from draft picks to NHL-ready types, to guys a year or two away. The pipeline which produced so many of the players we saw skate with the Cup last year (or were used to acquire so many of those players) now seems to be restocked to do it all over again.

Equally important, the Hawks are in a place to capitalize on this next wave. They've managed to open up a number of roster spots on the big league club while still keeping more than enough talent around to allow the youngsters to develop as complimentary pieces without much pressure.

As the Hawks learned the hard way over the past decade, when your big league club is devoid of any real talent, it's not easy to bring up prospects and turn them into high-impact NHLers. But you bring a guy up and let him ride shotgun with Toews and Kane? You let him do the dirty work for Sharp and Hossa? You let him kill penalties next to The Hammer? You let him learn to be a shutdown forward skating with Bolland?

That is how you seamlessly transition from one set of unproven complimentary pieces to another. And let's not forget, that's all the Hawks have gotten rid of this summer. Aside Madden, Sopel and Huet, no one they let go of was anything before the 07-08 breakout year. Only put next to supreme talent in a great system and allowed the time to develop, did the likes of Buff, Versteeg, Ladd, Eager, Burish, Fraser, and Niemi become the players we know today.

So why shouldn't we be confident that the next batch of Hawks prospects will similarly emerge? Bickell, Skille, Dowell, Stalberg, Hendry, Crawford, Leddy, Beach, Vishnevskiy, Lalonde, Makarov, and Toivonen all carry the same pedigrees, the same high expectations of our now departed Cup winners.

In fact, these guys probably are much more highly anticipated then what we had in that group above. Don't forget that a lot of these guys we just got rid of, if not all of them, were brought in to little fanfare. Mid to late round picks, unheralded trades, undrafted free agents. But the Hawks organization molded them into winners, just as I have faith they'll do with the next generation.


I can't guarantee everything the Bowmans did this summer was perfect. But I can promise you that we're only in this spot because of the great work they and Tallon did before. Mistakes didn't get us here, being incredibly good at their job of accumulating talent did. And we've got the freaking Cup to prove it!

And I can tell you that I love the core group they've committed to. And that the Hawks front office has earned your benefit of the doubt in terms of the prospects they've brought in and the guys they'll give time to next season. You shouldn't be feeling uneasy about the Cup defense - you should know that this organization is stocked with the core talent to win it and have proven they know how to fold the necessary complimentary pieces into the mix.

So the next idiot you hear reference the Florida Marlins or doubt what kind of team we'll return next year, just smile and nod. And then when they go to walk away, cross check them square in the back. "O'Doyle rules!"

14 comments:

  1. hahahah kick ass write up.. i too just shake my head when the fair weather fans ( like your cousin, brent)... gives me a ton of shit about how the hawks are gonna suck now. pffff...sorry, but we have the cup..i cant hear you, im too busy shining my cup, or.. i cant hear you, i have my stanley cup ring in my ear.. etc.
    F those people. Will they win it again next year? i hope so, but i'll keep it real and say, ANY team that wins the cup, in this cap based era, will have a hard time repeating. After years of watching them suck, I'll take the cup and i'll take having them be 'competitive'..ANY DAY.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad you agree.

    As I'll get to in my next post, I think the Hawks really kept the right guys around for another Cup run. Their D and scoring/playmaking guys are all still there. I don't think they'll miss the Versteegs and Buffs of the world like the Pens missed Gill and Scuderi on the blueline.

    And I love that Roy line about the ring in his ear. Classic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. honestly, i would have like to have kept Buff and Niemi. Buff b/c he was a 'gamer' in the playoffs.he showed up when it counted. so, i will miss him. you dont find a power forward like that everyday. but, like u said earlier, put anybody on the towes/kane line and they will succeed. and his stock was at the highest.

    Niemi too.. BUT... i kinda wish he would have been less greedy about that contract. 2mil not enough and u need 3? cmon bro. NOW where are you going to play? with the Islanders? LLOLOLOLOL have fun with that.

    but again.... these are my personal feelings.
    i wish huet and campbell werent such cap hogs. but..mr. dale tallon, we rolled the dice and won. much props. im sure hes liking FL with the warm weather and the golf. hahah. good for him.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If Tallon did such a great job assembling this superteam why did they sack him mid-season?

    ReplyDelete
  5. How much crack do you assholes in Shitcago smoke????? You bought the Championship. One and done bitches. See you in 50 years!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, you Shitcagoans bought the Cup, congratulations. Thanks for turning the most hallowed trophy in all of sports into whore jewelry.

    Remember when you were growing up, and there was that rich kid whose parents bought him everything he wanted even though he didn't deserve it, whereas you had to use brain power and elbow grease to find a way to earn it? Yeah, it's kinda like that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. all anonymous

    where are you from? wheres YOUR cup?
    thats what i thought.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Love all the comments - no idea where I got the sudden jump in readership yesterday, but thanks to whomever is responsible!

    Firing Tallon was purely political - there had long been backroom rumors that McDonough and the Bowmans weren't on the same page with Tallon, not really respecting his work ethic nor giving him credit for what he'd done.

    Supposedly a lot of the moves that were made (Campbell, Huet, Hossa were all mentioned) were not Tallon's call, but came from the McDonough/Bowman brain trust (with McDonough using his position to force the Bowmans' thoughts on Tallon).

    Lord knows Tallon wouldn't be the first guy fired for not fitting with management's style rather than for a lack of talent or execution - it happens in both sports and real life every day.


    As for the charge that the Hawks bought the Cup - what an ill-informed joke! Sure Hossa and Campbell were key pieces to the title, but I wouldn't consider two big-money free agents "buying a Cup."

    The Hawks only had the cap space to sign those two because they developed so much of their own talent. Almost all of their players were getting less than market value because the Hawks had them locked into deals before they reached their full potential.

    I will admit that the Hawks have a better financial position than most teams, being able to not only max out their cap, but also get creative so their actual payroll is well above most teams in the NHL.

    But to me this is more akin to the NBA, where some teams are willing to pay the luxury tax and some teams are not. It's an advantage, for sure, but not even remotely the main reason for one team's success over another.

    I think it's garbage to compare them to a team like the Yankees, who double the payroll of almost every competitor and often triple or even quadruple their opponents spending. That's buying a championship.

    What the Hawks did? They built a tremendous core due to a front office and coaching staff that's second to none in the NHL, then used their financial might to push themselves over the top.

    My proof? I think it'll come this year, when the Hawks no longer have as many guys clearly making less than market value, but still play like favorites all season.

    Whether or not they do it mostly will come down to being hot and healthy at the right time, but if they put up 100 points and look dangerous in the playoffs, even if they fall short of a title defense, I'll feel justified in my opinion of this front office and coaching staff.

    ReplyDelete
  9. MFer! I just posted a long comment responding to all these great comments and the stupid site wouldn't accept it. Talk about whores.

    So I'll try my best to be briefer (not my specialty). First off, thanks to whomever is responsible for the surge in readership yesterday. And thanks to those who read and commented - it's always appreciated. Especially Beck for defending our honor.

    Tallon was fired for political reasons - McD/Bowmans didn't respect his work ethic or value and preferred to run things themselves. Everyday, in sports and real life, guys are fired because they don't fit with management, not because of their talent or success. Tallon was no different. Tho I'm curious to see if he can do it again in FLA.

    As for buying the Cup - the Hawks only had money to spend on Campbell and Hossa because they did such a great job developing their own talent and getting them locked into cheap contracts before they broke out.

    Yes, the Hawks have an advantage in being able to max out their cap and bloat their payroll with cap tricks. However, it's just an advantage, not the reason they won. They won because the front office and coaching staff were as good as any in hockey. Aside Hossa and Campbell, the entire rest of the core was developed, as were most of the support pieces.

    ReplyDelete
  10. the anonymous poster is a detroit fan, so i'm quite sure they have a few more cups than you do. 4 cups in your entire existence is nothing compared to their 11 in a much shorter span of time.

    ReplyDelete
  11. well then that makes sense.. a detroit red wings fan, leaving these comments. too bad that city is a shit hole

    ReplyDelete
  12. yeah.....that has nothing to do with the caliber of the hockey team.

    ReplyDelete
  13. im just saying... all detroit has is the red wings.. and you didnt have that last year b/c we won it. seems like you dont have shit now.. except plenty of time to talk shit on a hawks board. jealousy is a bitch isnt it. and thanks for scotty bowman. not even he wanted to stick around in shit town.,, i mean.. Detroit.

    ReplyDelete
  14. yeah, i'm not the red wings fan....but i know the person who is. i'm just sick of the blackhawks fans that claim that they are all of a sudden better than detroit, when history proves otherwise. i choose to post anonymously because, well, that's my choice....i think you just got the two anonymous posters confused. did you ever think that maybe the outcome of the playoffs last season would have been different if you had to play detroit? who knows? i wasn't talking shit, just giving facts. sorry you can't handle it. good luck in the upcoming season.

    ReplyDelete